PAK Vs ENG, 1st Test: James Anderson Surpasses Anil Kumble Became Third Highest Test-wicket Takers’ List

PAK Vs ENG, 1st Test: James Anderson Surpasses Anil Kumble Became Third Highest Test-wicket Takers’ List


PAK vs ENG, James Anderson: England’s legendary fast bowler Jimmy Anderson has turned 40, but this player’s charm remains intact. Jimmy Anderson played a big role in England’s victory in the Rawalpindi Test against Pakistan. This player showed the way to the pavilion to four batsmen of Pakistan. Along with this, Jimmy Anderson has made a big record in his name. Actually, Jimmy Anderson has become the third highest wicket taker in international cricket.

Jimmy Anderson left behind Anil Kumble

Jimmy Anderson has left behind former Indian spinner Anil Kumble. Anil Kumble has a total of 956 wickets in all three formats of international cricket. At the same time, the great Sri Lankan spinner Muttiah Muralitharan is at number one in this list. Murali has a total of 1347 wickets in 495 matches. Whereas in this case, there is another veteran spinner Shane Warne at number two. He has a total of 1001 wickets in 339 matches. In this way, Jimmy Anderson is the only fast bowler in the list of bowlers who have taken the most wickets.

Pakistan lost in the first test match

News Reels

On the other hand, talking about this match, Pakistan had to face defeat by 74 runs. In this way, the England team has gone ahead 1-0 in the 3-Test series. Pakistan needed 342 runs to win the match, but the hosts were bundled out for 268 runs. In this way Ben Stokes’ team won the match by 74 runs. However, after 22 years, England has won Test matches on Pakistan’s soil. Saud Shakeel scored the most runs in the second innings for Pakistan. He played an inning of 76 runs in 159 balls.

read this also-

PAK vs ENG: England won the first Test by trapping Pakistan, Stokes adopted this special strategy

Hasan Ali: The audience made lewd comments on Hasan Ali, then the bowler clashed with the crowd, see VIDEO



Source link

Related posts

Leave a Reply